Risk assessments to help inform criminal justice decisions have been used in the United States since the 1920s. Over the past several years, statistical learning risk algorithms have been introduced amid much controversy about fairness, transparency and accuracy. In this paper, we focus on accuracy for a large department of probation and parole that is considering a major revision of its current, statistical learning risk methods. Because the content of each offender's supervision is substantially shaped by a forecast of subsequent conduct, forecasts have real consequences. Here we consider the probability that risk forecasts are correct. We augment standard statistical learning estimates of forecasting uncertainty (i.e., confusion tables) with uncertainty estimates from nested conformal prediction sets. In a demonstration of concept using data from the department of probation and parole, we show that the standard uncertainty measures and uncertainty measures from nested conformal prediction sets can differ dramatically in concept and output. We also provide a modification of nested conformal called the localized conformal method to match confusion tables more closely when possible. A strong case can be made favoring the nested and localized conformal approach. As best we can tell, our formulation of such comparisons and consequent recommendations is novel.
翻译:自1920年代以来,美国一直使用统计学习风险算法,帮助为刑事司法决定提供信息。在过去几年里,在对公平、透明和准确性存在许多争议的情况下,采用了统计学习风险算法。在本文件中,我们侧重于考虑对其当前统计学习风险方法进行重大修改的大型缓刑和假释部的准确性。由于每个罪犯的监督内容在很大程度上受随后行为的预测的影响,预测具有真正的后果。我们在这里考虑风险预测正确的可能性。我们用嵌套一致预测组的不确定性估算数(即混乱表)增加了标准的统计学习不确定性估计数。在使用来自缓刑和假释部的数据展示概念时,我们表明从嵌套符合预测组中得出的标准不确定性措施和不确定性措施在概念和产出上可能大不相同。我们还提出了所谓的本地一致方法的修改意见,以尽可能更密切地匹配混乱的表格。一个强有力的案例可以支持嵌套式和本地兼容方法。我们最好的判断是,我们制定这种比较和随后提出的建议是新颖的。