There is a growing trend regarding perceiving personal data as a commodity. Existing studies have built frameworks and theories about how to determine an arbitrage-free price of a given query according to the privacy loss quantified by differential privacy. However, those previous works have assumed that data buyers can purchase query answers with the arbitrary privacy loss of data owners, which may not be valid under strict privacy regulations such as GDPR and the increasing privacy concerns of data owners. In this paper, we study how to empower data owners with the control of privacy loss in regard to data trading. First, we propose a modularized framework for trading personal data that enables each data owner to bound her personalized privacy loss from data trading. Second, since bounded privacy losses indicate bounded utilities of query answers, we propose a reasonable relaxation of arbitrage freeness named partial arbitrage freeness, i.e., the guarantee of arbitrage-free pricing only for a limited range of utilities, which provides more possibilities for our market design. Third, to avoid arbitrage behaviors, we propose a general method for ensuring arbitrage freeness under personalized differential privacy. Fourth, to make full use of data owners' personalized privacy loss bounds, we propose online privacy budget allocation techniques to dynamically allocate privacy losses for queries under arbitrage freeness.
翻译:在将个人数据视为商品方面,正在形成一种日益增长的趋势。现有研究已经建立了一些框架和理论,如何根据以差异隐私权量化的隐私损失确定无套利价格;然而,先前的这些工程假设,数据购买者可以以数据拥有者的任意隐私损失来购买查询答案,而根据严格隐私条例,如GDPR, 以及数据拥有者对隐私的日益关切,这可能不成立。在本文件中,我们研究如何授权数据拥有者控制数据交易方面的隐私损失。首先,我们提议了一个模块化的个人数据交易框架,使每个数据拥有者能够将个人化隐私损失与数据交易捆绑在一起。第二,由于被捆绑的隐私损失表明受约束的查询工具,我们提议合理放宽仲裁自由自由度,称为部分仲裁自由,即保证仅对有限范围的公用事业实行无套利定价,这为我们市场设计提供了更多的可能性。第三,为了避免套利行为,我们提议了一种确保个人化隐私隐私隐私损失的仲裁自由度的一般方法。第四,由于被绑定的隐私损失,我们提议在动态保密预算分配下充分使用个人隐私损失的保密技术。