Reviewing the literature to understand relevant threads of past work is a critical part of research and vehicle for learning. However, as the scientific literature grows the challenges for users to find and make sense of the many different threads of research grow as well. Previous work has helped scholars to find and group papers with citation information or textual similarity using standalone tools or overview visualizations. Instead, in this work we explore a tool integrated into users' reading process that helps them with leveraging authors' existing summarization of threads, typically in introduction or related work sections, in order to situate their own work's contributions. To explore this we developed a prototype that supports efficient extraction and organization of threads along with supporting evidence as scientists read research articles. The system then recommends further relevant articles based on user-created threads. We evaluate the system in a lab study and find that it helps scientists to follow and curate research threads without breaking out of their flow of reading, collect relevant papers and clips, and discover interesting new articles to further grow threads.
翻译:审视文献以了解过去工作的相关线索是研究和学习工具的一个关键部分。然而,随着科学文献增加用户发现和理解许多不同研究线索的挑战,也随之而来。先前的工作帮助学者利用独立工具或视觉化概览来查找和整理引文信息或文本相似性的文件。相反,我们在这项工作中探索了一种融入用户阅读过程的工具,帮助他们利用作者现有线索的汇总,通常是在介绍或相关工作部分,以定位他们自己的工作贡献。为了探索这一点,我们开发了一种原型,用以支持高效提取和整理线索,同时作为科学家阅读研究文章的辅助证据。系统随后又根据用户创建的线索进一步推荐相关文章。我们在一项实验室研究中评估了该系统,发现它有助于科学家跟踪和整理研究线索,而不会断开他们的阅读流,收集相关论文和剪辑,并发现有趣的新文章以进一步发展线索。