The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) raises a central question: are investments in compute infrastructure matched by an equally robust build-out of skills, incentives, and governance? Grounded in socio-technical systems (STS) theory, this mixed-methods study audits workforce preparedness across Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman. We combine term frequency--inverse document frequency (TF--IDF) analysis of six national AI strategies (NASs), an inventory of 47 publicly disclosed AI initiatives (January 2017--April 2025), paired case studies, the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI) and the Saudi Data & Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA) Academy, and a scenario matrix linking oil-revenue slack (technical capacity) to regulatory coherence (social alignment). Across the corpus, 34/47 initiatives (0.72; 95% Wilson CI 0.58--0.83) exhibit joint social--technical design; country-level indices span 0.57--0.90 (small n; intervals overlap). Scenario results suggest that, under our modeled conditions, regulatory convergence plausibly binds outcomes more than fiscal capacity: fragmented rules can offset high oil revenues, while harmonized standards help preserve progress under austerity. We also identify an emerging two-track talent system, research elites versus rapidly trained practitioners, that risks labor-market bifurcation without bridging mechanisms. By extending STS inquiry to oil-rich, state-led economies, the study refines theory and sets a research agenda focused on longitudinal coupling metrics, ethnographies of coordination, and outcome-based performance indicators.
翻译:人工智能在海湾合作委员会地区的快速扩张引发了一个核心问题:计算基础设施的投资是否与技能培养、激励机制及治理体系的同步建设相匹配?本研究基于社会技术系统理论,采用混合研究方法,对沙特阿拉伯王国、阿拉伯联合酋长国、卡塔尔、科威特、巴林和阿曼的劳动力准备状况进行了系统评估。我们综合运用了六国人工智能国家战略的术语频率-逆文档频率分析、对47项已公开人工智能倡议(2017年1月至2025年4月)的清单梳理、配对案例研究(以穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学和沙特数据与人工智能管理局学院为例),以及连接石油收入弹性(技术能力)与监管一致性(社会协同)的情景矩阵分析。整体数据显示,47项倡议中有34项(占比0.72;95%威尔逊置信区间0.58-0.83)展现出社会-技术协同设计特征;国家层面的协同指数分布在0.57-0.90之间(样本量有限,置信区间存在重叠)。情景模拟结果表明,在我们设定的模型条件下,监管趋同性对结果的影响可能超过财政能力:碎片化的法规可能抵消高石油收入的积极效应,而统一标准则有助于在财政紧缩时期维持发展进程。研究还发现初现的双轨制人才体系——研究精英与速成实践者之间的分化——若缺乏衔接机制可能导致劳动力市场割裂。通过将社会技术系统理论拓展至石油资源丰富、国家主导型经济体,本研究不仅完善了理论框架,还提出了聚焦纵向耦合度量、协调机制民族志研究及基于结果的绩效指标的未来研究议程。