Research in sociology and linguistics shows that people use language not only to express their own identity but to understand the identity of others. Recent work established a connection between expression of identity and emoji usage on social media, through use of emoji skin tone modifiers. Motivated by that finding, this work asks if, as with language, readers are sensitive to such acts of self-expression and use them to understand the identity of authors. In behavioral experiments (n=488), where text and emoji content of social media posts were carefully controlled before being presented to participants, we find in the affirmative -- emoji are a salient signal of author identity. That signal is distinct from, and complementary to, the one encoded in language. Participant groups (based on self-identified ethnicity) showed no differences in how they perceive this signal, except in the case of the default yellow emoji. While both groups associate this with a White identity, the effect was stronger in White participants. Our finding that emoji can index social variables will have experimental applications for researchers but also implications for designers: supposedly ``neutral`` defaults may be more representative of some users than others.
翻译:社会学和语言研究显示,人们不仅使用语言来表达自己的身份,而且理解他人的身份。最近的工作通过使用表情色色色色色的皮肤音调修正器,在社交媒体的身份表达和使用表情之间建立起了联系。根据这一发现,这项工作询问读者是否像语言一样对这种自我表达行为敏感,并使用它们来理解作者的身份。在行为实验(n=488)中,社交媒体文章的文字和表情内容在向参与者介绍之前受到仔细控制,我们发现,在肯定的方面 -- -- emoji是作者身份的突出信号。该信号与语言编码的一个信号不同,而且互为补充。参与者群体(以自我认同的族裔为基础)在如何看待这一信号方面没有差异,但默认的黄色表情除外。这两个群体将此与白色身份联系起来,但在白人参与者中效果更大。我们发现,emoji可以将社会变量指数化为研究人员提供实验性应用,但也对设计师有影响:据推测,“中立性”的默认值可能比其他用户更具代表性。