Linking research results to grants is an essential prerequisite for an effective monitoring and evaluation of funding programs. For the EU research funding programs, there are multiple datasets linking scholarly publications to the individual grants, including both open data and those from commercial bibliometric databases. In this paper, we systematically compare openly available data from two data sources: on one hand those reported by the Grant holders (and subsequently published by the European Commission on open data portal) and those from the OpenAIRE Research Graph which collect data from multiple sources. We describe the dataflow leading to their creation and assess the quality of data by validating, on sample basis, the link <project, publications>. We report that, by and large, OpenAIRE Research Graph offers a more complete dataset of scholarly outputs of from EU Research funding programs. We identify also possible improvements and make recommendations on how they can be addressed.
翻译:将研究成果与赠款挂钩是有效监测和评价供资方案的必要先决条件。对欧盟研究供资方案而言,有多种数据集将学术出版物与个别赠款联系起来,包括开放数据和商业生物量测数据库的数据。在本文中,我们系统地比较两个数据来源的公开数据:一方面是赠款持有者报告的数据(随后由欧洲联盟委员会在开放数据门户上公布),另一方面是从多种来源收集数据的开放信息信息网络研究图的数据。我们通过抽样验证链接<项目,出版物>,说明导致数据生成的数据流,并评估数据质量。我们报告说,从总体上看,OpenAIRE研究图提供了欧盟研究供资方案学术产出的更完整的数据集。我们还确定了可能的改进,并就如何解决这些问题提出建议。