Contextual bandits often provide simple and effective personalization in decision making problems, making them popular in many domains including digital health. However, when bandits are deployed in the context of a scientific study, the aim is not only to personalize for an individual, but also to determine, with sufficient statistical power, whether or not the system's intervention is effective. The two objectives are often deployed under different model assumptions, making it hard to determine how achieving one goal affects the other. In this work, we develop general meta-algorithms to modify existing algorithms such that sufficient power is guaranteed, without significant decrease in average return. We also demonstrate that our meta-algorithms are robust to various model mis-specifications.
翻译:土匪在决策中往往提供简单而有效的个性化问题,使其在包括数字健康在内的许多领域受到欢迎;然而,当在科学研究中部署土匪时,目的不仅在于个人化,而且在于以足够的统计力量确定系统的干预是否有效;这两个目标往往在不同的模式假设下部署,难以确定实现一个目标如何影响另一个目标;在这项工作中,我们制定一般元等级,以修改现有的算法,保证足够的权力,而不会显著降低平均回报率;我们还表明我们的元等级对各种模型的错误特性是强大的。