Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals (e.g., clinics or communities) and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. While offering many advantages, this experimental design introduces challenges that are only partially addressed by existing analytic approaches. First, outcomes are often missing for some individuals within clusters. Failing to appropriately adjust for differential outcome measurement can result in biased estimates and inference. Second, CRTs often randomize limited numbers of clusters, resulting in chance imbalances on baseline outcome predictors between arms. Failing to adaptively adjust for these imbalances and other predictive covariates can result in efficiency losses. To address these methodological gaps, we propose and evaluate a novel two-stage targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) to adjust for baseline covariates in a manner that optimizes precision, after controlling for baseline and post-baseline causes of missing outcomes. Finite sample simulations illustrate that our approach can nearly eliminate bias due to differential outcome measurement, while existing CRT estimators yield misleading results and inferences. Application to real data from the SEARCH community randomized trial demonstrates the gains in efficiency afforded through adaptive adjustment for baseline covariates, after controlling for missingness on individual-level outcomes.
翻译:分组随机试验(CRTs)随机地将干预分配给个人群体(例如诊所或社区),并衡量这些群体中的个人结果。这个实验设计虽然提供了许多优势,但提出挑战,而现有的分析方法只是部分解决了这些挑战。首先,某些群体中的个人往往缺乏结果。由于对差异结果的衡量不作适当调整,可能导致偏差估计和推断。第二,CRTs往往随机地将数量有限的组群数目随机地分配,导致武器之间在基线结果预测器上出现机会不平衡。由于无法适应这些不平衡和其他预测性共变情况,可能导致效率损失。为了解决这些方法上的差距,我们提议并评价一个新的两阶段目标最低损失估计(TMLE),以优化基线共变数,在控制基线和基数缺失结果后的原因后,以优化精确的方式进行调整。微量抽样模拟表明,我们的方法几乎可以消除因结果衡量差异而产生的偏差,而造成偏差估计现有CRTs 估计结果和推论可能导致效率损失。为了解决这些方法上的差距,我们建议和评估了SEARCH社区对实际数据的应用,在调整基准水平后,通过共同控制计算结果的调整结果,对单个调整后,对实际数据进行了联合调整。