Social platforms are evolving at a rapid pace. With the addition of new features like real-time audio, the landscape of online communities and moderation work on these communities is being out-paced by platform development. In this paper, we present a novel framework that allows us to represent the dynamic moderation ecosystems of social platforms using a base-set of 12 platform-level affordances, along with inter-affordance relationships. These affordances fall into the three categories -- Members, Infrastructure, and Content. We call this the MIC framework, and apply MIC to analyze several social platforms in two case studies. First we analyze individual platforms using MIC and demonstrate how MIC can be used to examine the effects of platform changes on the moderation ecosystem and identify potential new challenges in moderation. Next, we systematically compare three platforms using MIC and propose potential moderation mechanisms that platforms can adapt from one another. Moderation researchers and platform designers can use such comparisons to uncover where platforms can emulate established, successful and better-studied platforms, as well as learn from the pitfalls other platforms have encountered.
翻译:社会平台正在快速发展。 随着实时音频、在线社区景观和节制工作等新特征的增加, 平台开发速度超过了这些社区的工作速度。 在本文中, 我们提出了一个新的框架, 允许我们使用由12个平台级发价组成的一组基数来代表社会平台的动态温和生态系统, 以及各种支付能力关系。 这些负担能力属于三类 — — 成员、 基础设施和内容。 我们称之为MIC框架, 并在两个案例研究中应用MIC来分析几个社会平台。 首先, 我们利用MIC分析单个平台, 并展示如何利用MIC来审查平台变化对温和生态系统的影响, 并找出潜在的温和新挑战。 其次, 我们系统地比较三个平台, 使用MIC 并提出平台可以相互适应的潜在温和机制。 调研究人员和平台设计师可以使用这种比较来发现平台在哪些地方可以效仿、 成功和研究得更好的平台, 并从其他平台的陷阱中学习。