Citation cascades in blog networks are often considered as traces of information spreading on this social medium. In this work, we question this point of view using both a structural and semantic analysis of five months activity of the most representative blogs of the french-speaking community.Statistical measures reveal that our dataset shares many features with those that can be found in the literature, suggesting the existence of an identical underlying process. However, a closer analysis of the post content indicates that the popular epidemic-like descriptions of cascades are misleading in this context.A basic model, taking only into account the behavior of bloggers and their restricted social network, accounts for several important statistical features of the data.These arguments support the idea that citations primary goal may not be information spreading on the blogosphere.
翻译:在这项工作中,我们使用对法语社区最具代表性的博客五个月活动的结构性和语义性分析,对这一观点提出质疑。 统计措施表明,我们的数据集与文献中可以找到的数据集有许多共同特征,表明存在一个完全相同的基本过程。然而,对文章内容的更仔细分析表明,流行流行的类似流行病的串联描述在这方面具有误导性。 一种基本模式,只考虑博客及其受限的社会网络的行为,说明数据的若干重要统计特征。 这些论点支持这样的观点,即引用的主要目标可能不是在博客圈上传播信息。