In this paper, we analyze the causes and discuss potential consequences of perceived privatization of AI research, particularly the transition of AI researchers from academia to industry. We explore the scale of the phenomenon by quantifying transition flows between industry and academia, and providing a descriptive account and exploratory analysis of characteristics of industry transition. Here we find that industry researchers and those transitioning into industry produce more impactful research as measured by citations. Using a survival regression approach we identify mechanisms that trigger these university-industry transitions focusing on researcher characteristics, performance, and research field as documented in bibliographic data. We find that researchers working within the field of deep learning as well as those with higher average impact tend to transition into industry. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening academic research in public organizations within AI to balance a potential dominance of private companies and to maintain public supervision of the development and application of this technology.
翻译:在本文中,我们分析认为AI研究私有化的原因和讨论其潜在后果,特别是AI研究人员从学术界向工业过渡。我们通过量化工业和学术界之间的过渡流动,并提供关于工业转型特点的说明性说明和探索性分析,探索这一现象的规模。我们在这里发现,工业研究人员和那些向工业过渡的研究人员根据引文的衡量结果,产生了更具影响力的研究。我们利用生存回归方法,确定了引发这些大学和工业转型的机制,侧重于文献数据中记载的研究人员特点、业绩和研究领域。我们发现,在深层次学习领域工作的研究人员以及具有较高平均影响的研究人员往往会向工业过渡。这些结论强调了加强大赦国际内公共组织的学术研究的重要性,以平衡私营公司的潜在支配地位,并保持公众对这一技术的发展和应用的监督。