A key objective of decomposition analysis is to identify a factor (the 'mediator') contributing to disparities in an outcome between social groups. In decomposition analysis, a scholarly interest often centers on estimating how much the disparity (e.g., health disparities between Black women and White men) would be reduced/remain if we set the mediator (e.g., education) distribution of one social group equal to another. However, causally identifying disparity reduction and remaining depends on the no omitted mediator-outcome confounding assumption, which is not empirically testable. Therefore, we propose a set of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of disparity reduction to possible unobserved confounding. We provide sensitivity analysis techniques based on regression coefficients and $R^2$ values. The proposed techniques are flexible to address unobserved confounding measured before and after the group status. In addition, $R^2$-based sensitivity analysis offers a straightforward interpretation of sensitivity parameters and a standard way to report the robustness of research findings. Although we introduce sensitivity analysis techniques in the context of decomposition analysis, they can be utilized in any mediation setting based on interventional indirect effects.
翻译:分解分析的一个关键目标是找出造成社会群体之间结果差异的因素(“调解者”),在分解分析中,学术兴趣往往集中在估计如果我们确定一个社会群体的调解人(例如教育)与另一个社会群体的分布等同,那么差异(例如,教育)的分布会减少/减少多少(例如,黑人妇女和白人男子之间的健康差距),但是,从因果确定差异的减少和继续取决于没有遗漏的调解者-结果混杂的假设,这是没有经验检验的。因此,我们提出一套敏感度分析,以评估缩小差异的稳健性与可能无法观察到的混杂情况。我们提供基于回归系数和2美元价值的敏感性分析技术。拟议的技术灵活地处理在集团地位之前和之后所衡量的未观察到的混杂问题。此外,基于2美元的敏感性分析对敏感度参数进行了直截了解释,并提供了报告研究结果的稳健性的标准方法。虽然我们在分解分析中采用了敏感度分析技术,但在任何基于干预间接效果的调解中都可以使用。