Reusing ontologies in practice is still very challenging, especially when multiple ontologies are (jointly) involved. Moreover, despite recent advances, the realization of systematic ontology quality assurance remains a difficult problem. In this work, the quality of thirty biomedical ontologies, and the Computer Science Ontology are investigated, from the perspective of a practical use case. Special scrutiny is given to cross-ontology references, which are vital for combining ontologies. Diverse methods to detect potential issues are proposed, including natural language processing and network analysis. Moreover, several suggestions for improving ontologies and their quality assurance processes are presented. It is argued that while the advancing automatic tools for ontology quality assurance are crucial for ontology improvement, they will not solve the problem entirely. It is ontology reuse that is the ultimate method for continuously verifying and improving ontology quality, as well as for guiding its future development. Specifically, multiple issues can be found and fixed primarily through practical and diverse ontology reuse scenarios.
翻译:在实践中,特别是在涉及多种本源(共同)的情况下,重新使用本源学仍然是非常困难的,此外,尽管最近取得了一些进展,但实现系统本源学质量保证仍然是一个困难的问题;在这项工作中,从实际使用个案的角度来看,30种生物医学本源学和计算机科学本源学的质量受到调查;对交叉本源学参考资料进行特别审查,这些参考资料对合并本源学至关重要;提出了发现潜在问题的多种方法,包括自然语言处理和网络分析;此外,还提出了改进本源学及其质量保证程序的若干建议;有人认为,虽然推进本源学质量保证自动工具对于本源学的改进至关重要,但它们不会完全解决问题;本源学再利用是持续核实和提高本源学质量以及指导其未来发展的最终方法;具体地说,可以发现和固定多种问题,主要是通过实用和多样本源再利用设想。