Ride-hailing marketplaces like Uber and Lyft use dynamic pricing, often called surge, to balance the supply of available drivers with the demand for rides. We study driver-side payment mechanisms for such marketplaces, presenting the theoretical foundation that has informed the design of Uber's new additive driver surge mechanism. We present a dynamic stochastic model to capture the impact of surge pricing on driver earnings and their strategies to maximize such earnings. In this setting, some time periods (surge) are more valuable than others (non-surge), and so trips of different time lengths vary in the induced driver opportunity cost. First, we show that multiplicative surge, historically the standard on ride-hailing platforms, is not incentive compatible in a dynamic setting. We then propose a structured, incentive-compatible pricing mechanism. This closed-form mechanism has a simple form and is well-approximated by Uber's new additive surge mechanism. Finally, through both numerical analysis and real data from a ride-hailing marketplace, we show that additive surge is more incentive compatible in practice than is multiplicative surge.
翻译:Uber 和 Lyft 等赛道市场使用动态定价(通常称为快速激增)来平衡现有驾驶员的供应和驾车需求。 我们研究这些市场的驾驶员支付机制, 展示为Uber 新的添加型驱动器激增机制设计提供依据的理论基础。 我们展示了一个动态随机模型,以捕捉快速定价对驾驶员收入的影响及其最大限度地增加这种收入的战略。 在这种环境下,一些时段(急增)比其他时段(非突击)更宝贵,因此不同时长的旅行在驾驶员机会成本方面各不相同。 首先,我们发现乘车平台上历来采用的标准乘车的乘车激增在动态环境中不具有兼容性。 我们然后提出一个结构化的、与激励相兼容的定价机制。 这个封闭式机制的形式简单,而且与Uber 的新添加型激增机制十分接近。 最后,通过数字分析和来自骑车市场的真实数据,我们显示,在实际操作中,添加剂的刺激比多倍化激增更为一致。