As cybercriminals scale up their operations to increase their profits or inflict greater harm, we argue that there is an equal need to respond to their threats by scaling up cybersecurity. To achieve this goal, we have to develop a co-productive approach towards data collection and sharing by overcoming the cybersecurity data sharing paradox. This is where we all agree on the definition of the problem and end goal (improving cybersecurity and getting rid of cybercrime), but we disagree about how to achieve it and fail to work together efficiently. At the core of this paradox is the observation that public interests differ from private interests. As a result, industry and law enforcement take different approaches to the cybersecurity problem as they seek to resolve incidents in their own interests, which manifests in different data sharing practices between both and also other interested parties, such as cybersecurity researchers. The big question we ask is can these interests be reconciled to develop an interdisciplinary approach towards co-operation and sharing data. In essence, all three will have to co-own the problem in order to co-produce a solution. We argue that a few operational models with good practices exist that provide guides to a possible solution, especially multiple third-party ownership organisations which consolidate, anonymise and analyse data. To take this forward, we suggest the practical solution of organising co-productive data collection on a sectoral basis, but acknowledge that common standards for data collection will also have to be developed and agreed upon. We propose an initial set of best practices for building collaborations and sharing data and argue that these best practices need to be developed and standardised in order to mitigate the paradox.
翻译:随着网络罪犯扩大行动规模以增加其利润或造成更大的伤害,我们争辩说,同样需要通过扩大网络安全来应对其威胁。为了实现这一目标,我们必须通过克服网络安全数据共享的悖论,在数据收集和共享方面采取共同有益的做法。这是我们都同意问题定义和最终目标的地方(改善网络安全,消除网络犯罪),但我们在如何实现这一目标和如何有效合作方面意见不一。这种悖论的核心是公众利益不同于私人利益的观察。因此,工业和执法部门在设法解决网络安全问题时采取不同的做法。因此,为了解决网络安全问题,我们不得不采取不同的做法。这表现在双方都和其他感兴趣的方面,例如网络安全研究人员,在不同的数据共享做法中表现出来。我们提出的大问题是,这些利益可以调和为合作和共享数据制定一种跨学科的方法。基本上,所有这三个机构都必须共同解决问题,以便共同提出解决办法。我们提出一些具有最佳做法的模型,为可能的解决方案提供指南,特别是多个第三方所有权组织,例如网络安全研究人员。我们提出的大问题是,为了巩固共同收集数据,我们还要提出一个共同的数据收集基础。