Decision making models are constrained by taking the expert evaluations with pre-defined numerical or linguistic terms. We claim that the use of sentiment analysis will allow decision making models to consider expert evaluations in natural language. Accordingly, we propose the Sentiment Analysis based Multi-person Multi-criteria Decision Making (SA-MpMcDM) methodology for smarter decision aid, which builds the expert evaluations from their natural language reviews, and even from their numerical ratings if they are available. The SA-MpMcDM methodology incorporates an end-to-end multi-task deep learning model for aspect based sentiment analysis, named DOC-ABSADeepL model, able to identify the aspect categories mentioned in an expert review, and to distill their opinions and criteria. The individual evaluations are aggregated via the procedure named criteria weighting through the attention of the experts. We evaluate the methodology in a case study of restaurant choice using TripAdvisor reviews, hence we build, manually annotate, and release the TripR-2020 dataset of restaurant reviews. We analyze the SA-MpMcDM methodology in different scenarios using and not using natural language and numerical evaluations. The analysis shows that the combination of both sources of information results in a higher quality preference vector.
翻译:决策模式因采用预先界定的数字或语言术语的专家评价而受到限制。我们声称,情绪分析的使用将使决策模式能够考虑自然语言的专家评价。因此,我们提出基于感化分析的多人多标准决策(SA-MpMcDM)方法,用于更聪明的决策援助,该方法将专家评价从其自然语言审查中建立起来,如果有的话,甚至从其数字评级中建立起来。SA-MpMcDM方法包含一个以端到端的多任务深度学习模型,用于基于方方面面的情绪分析,名为DOC-ABSADIPL模型,能够确定专家审查中提到的方面类别,并提炼他们的意见和标准。单项评价是通过专家注意的命名标准加以汇总的。我们用TripAdvisor审查来评估餐厅选择案例研究中的方法,因此我们用手动的注解,并发布TripR-2020餐厅审查数据集。我们分析SA-MCDMDM方法在使用或不使用自然语言和数字评价的不同情景下采用更高质量评估的结果。分析显示两种来源的组合。