Relation extraction is an important task in knowledge acquisition and text understanding. Existing works mainly focus on improving relation extraction by extracting effective features or designing reasonable model structures. However, few works have focused on how to validate and correct the results generated by the existing relation extraction models. We argue that validation is an important and promising direction to further improve the performance of relation extraction. In this paper, we explore the possibility of using question answering as validation. Specifically, we propose a novel question-answering based framework to validate the results from relation extraction models. Our proposed framework can be easily applied to existing relation classifiers without any additional information. We conduct extensive experiments on the popular NYT dataset to evaluate the proposed framework, and observe consistent improvements over five strong baselines.
翻译:现有工作主要侧重于通过提取有效特征或设计合理的模型结构来改进关系提取;然而,很少有工作侧重于如何验证和纠正现有关系提取模型产生的结果;我们辩称,验证是进一步改善关系提取绩效的重要和有希望的方向;我们在本文件中探讨用问答作为验证的可能性;具体地说,我们提议了一个基于新颖的问答框架,以验证关系提取模型的结果;我们提议的框架可以很容易地适用于现有的关系分类人员,而无需任何额外信息;我们广泛试验广受欢迎的NYT数据集,以评估拟议的框架,并观察五个强力基线的一致改进。