"What-if" questions are intuitively generated and commonly asked during the design process. Engineers and architects need to inherently conduct design decisions, progressing from one phase to another. They either use empirical domain experience, simulations, or data-driven methods to acquire consequential feedback. We take an example from an interdisciplinary domain of energy-efficient building design to argue that the current methods for decision support have limitations or deficiencies in four aspects: parametric independency identification, gaps in integrating knowledge-based and data-driven approaches, less explicit model interpretation, and ambiguous decision support boundaries. In this study, we first clarify the nature of dynamic experience in individuals and constant principal knowledge in design. Subsequently, we introduce causal inference into the domain. A four-step process is proposed to discover and analyze parametric dependencies in a mathematically rigorous and computationally efficient manner by identifying the causal diagram with interventions. The causal diagram provides a nexus for integrating domain knowledge with data-driven methods, providing interpretability and testability against the domain experience within the design space. Extracting causal structures from the data is close to the nature design reasoning process. As an illustration, we applied the properties of the proposed estimators through simulations. The paper concludes with a feasibility study demonstrating the proposed framework's realization.
翻译:工程师和建筑师需要从一个阶段到另一个阶段内在地进行设计决定,从一个阶段发展到另一个阶段。他们要么使用经验领域经验、模拟,要么以数据驱动的方法获得相应的反馈。我们从一个节能建筑设计跨学科领域举一个例子,指出目前决策支持方法在四个方面有局限性或缺陷:参数依赖性识别、知识基础和数据驱动方法整合方面的差距、模型解释不够明确,以及决定支持界限模糊。在本研究中,我们首先澄清个人动态经验的性质和设计方面经常掌握的主要知识。随后,我们将因果推断引入这个领域。我们建议采用一个四步过程,通过数学上严格和计算效率高的方式发现和分析参数依赖性,方法是确定因果图和干预措施之间的因果关系。因果图为将域知识与数据驱动方法相结合、提供可解释性和可测试性与设计空间的域经验提供了联系。从数据中提取因果关系结构与自然设计推理过程密切相关。随后,我们提出一个四步进程,即从数学上严格和计算分析参数,我们通过模拟了拟议的实现框架。