Electricity exchanges offer several trading possibilities for market participants: derivative products like futures, the spot market consisting of auctions and continuous trading, and balancing markets. This variety of choice creates a new question for traders - when and how much to trade to maximize the profit. When trading larger volumes this problem gets particularly important as such trades influence the prices substantially. The following paper raises this issue considering two markets: the hourly Day-Ahead Auction and the quarter-hourly Intraday Auction. We consider a realistic setting which includes a forecasting study and a suitable evaluation. For an optimal coordinated bidding many price scenarios are considered, the own non-linear market impact is estimated by considering empirical supply and demand curves, and a number of trading strategies is used. Additionally, we provide theoretical results for risk neutral agents. The application study is conducted using the German market data, but the presented methods can be easily utilized with other two consecutive markets. This paper contributes to the existing literature by evaluating the costs of electricity trading, i.e. the price impact and the transaction costs. The empirical results for the German EPEX market show that market participants could increase their gains significantly by lowering their overall price impact. We also provide an evidence of irrelevance of the market arbitrage which indicates market efficiency.
翻译:电力交易所为市场参与者提供了几种贸易可能性:期货等衍生产品,即由拍卖和持续交易组成的现货市场,以及平衡市场。这种选择的多样性给贸易商带来了一个新的问题――何时和多少交易才能使利润最大化。当交易量增加时,这一问题变得特别重要,因为这类交易对价格有重大影响。以下论文提出这一问题,同时考虑到两个市场:即每天每小时拍卖和每小时四分之一小时的拍卖。我们考虑一种现实的环境,其中包括一项预测研究和适当的评估。为了对许多价格设想进行最佳协调的投标,通过考虑实证供求曲线来估计自己的非线性市场影响,并使用一些贸易战略。此外,我们为风险中立代理人提供理论结果。应用研究是利用德国市场数据进行的,但所提出的方法很容易与其他两个连续的市场一起使用。本文通过评估电力交易的成本,即价格影响和交易成本,对现有的文献有所帮助。德国EPEX市场的经验结果显示,市场参与者通过降低总体价格稳定影响,可以大大提高其收益。我们还提供了市场效率的证据。