As we address the grand challenges of our time, inclusivity and representation become key success factors. This study examined the geodiversity of researchers through a case study of publications related to the United Nations SDG 2 - Zero hunger. We assumed topical focus if a country was mentioned in the title or abstract of an article. We also determined author location through their institutional affiliation. We organised 60,000 hunger-related publications by country focus and by country affiliation according to the 2021 Global Hunger Index country categories. This revealed insights into the share of research into hunger conducted by academics based in affected areas and the relationship between local and international researchers. Only 41% of hunger-related publications that focus on countries in the GHI alarming or extremely alarming categories feature authors affiliated to institutions in those countries. Even fewer of those publications feature locally based authors in first or last position. These numbers gradually reverse as the level of hunger declines. We urge caution before leaping to conclusions related to helicopter research based on author affiliations and authorship position. A manual examination of randomly sampled papers suggests that many underlying factors contribute to the overall trends.
翻译:随着我们处理我们时代的重大挑战,包容性和代表性成为关键的成功因素。本研究报告通过对联合国SDG 2 - 零饥饿相关出版物的个案研究,审查了研究人员的地理多样性。如果在文章的标题或摘要中提及一个国家,我们便以专题为重点。我们还通过其机构联系确定了作者位置。我们根据2021年全球饥饿指数国家类别,按国家重点和所属国家类别,按国家组织了60,000份与饥饿有关的出版物。这揭示了对受影响地区学术界对饥饿问题研究的比例以及地方和国际研究人员之间关系的洞察力。只有41%的与饥饿有关的出版物以GHI有关或极其令人震惊的类别中属于这些机构的作者为主。这些出版物中,只有41%的作者是这些国家的机构所属机构,而以当地为主的作者则更少。这些数字随着饥饿程度的下降而逐渐逆转。我们敦促在根据作者关系和作者地位对直升机研究的结论作出跳跃之前谨慎。对随机抽样的论文进行人工检查表明,许多基本因素促成了总体趋势。