As Engineering Education Research (EER) develops as a discipline it is necessary for EER scholars to contribute to the development of learning theory rather than simply being informed by it. It has been suggested that to do this effectively will require partnerships between Engineering scholars and psychologists, education researchers, including other social scientists. The formation of such partnerships is particularly important when considering the introduction of business-related skills into engineering curriculum designed to prepare 21st Century Engineering Students for workplace challenges. In order to encourage scholars beyond Engineering to engage with EER, it is necessary to provide an introduction to the complexities of EER. With this aim in mind, this paper provides an outline review of what is considered rigorous research from an EER perspective as well as highlighting some of the core methodological traditions of EER. The paper aims to facilitate further discussion between EER scholars and researchers from other disciplines, ultimately leading to future collaboration on innovative and rigorous EER.
翻译:随着工程教育研究作为一种学科的发展,教育研究学者有必要为学习理论的发展作出贡献,而不是简单地从中了解情况。有人建议,要有效地做到这一点,就需要工程学者与心理学家、教育研究人员,包括其他社会科学家之间建立伙伴关系。在考虑将与商业有关的技能纳入旨在培养21世纪工程学生迎接工作场所挑战的工程课程时,这种伙伴关系的形成尤其重要。为了鼓励工程系以外的学者与工程系学生接触,有必要介绍经济学系的复杂性。考虑到这个目标,本文件概要回顾从环境经济学角度看被视为严格研究的内容,并突出环境经济学系的一些核心方法传统。该文件旨在便利环境经济学系的学者与其他学科的研究人员进一步讨论,最终导致今后在创新和严格的环境经济学系方面开展协作。