There appears to be a common agreement that ethical concerns are of high importance when it comes to systems equipped with some sort of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Demands for ethical AI are declared from all directions. As a response, in recent years, public bodies, governments, and universities have rushed in to provide a set of principles to be considered when AI based systems are designed and used. We have learned, however, that high-level principles do not turn easily into actionable advice for practitioners. Hence, also companies are publishing their own ethical guidelines to guide their AI development. This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective. The software engineering paradigm has introduced maturity model thinking, which provides a roadmap for companies to improve their performance from the selected viewpoints known as the key capabilities. We want to voice out a call for action for the development of a maturity model for AI software. We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system, called a maturity model for the development of AI systems.
翻译:人们普遍同意,对于配备某种人工智能(AI)的系统来说,伦理问题似乎非常重要。对伦理AI的要求来自各个方向。作为回应,近年来,公共机构、政府和大学都急于提出一套原则,供在设计和使用基于AI的系统时考虑。然而,我们了解到,高级别原则不易转化为对从业人员的可操作建议。因此,公司也正在公布自己的道德准则,以指导其大赦国际的发展。本文认为,AI软件仍然是软件,需要从软件开发的角度来处理。软件工程模式引入了成熟模式思维,为公司从选定的、被称为关键能力的观点改进业绩提供了路线图。我们要呼吁采取行动,为AI软件开发成熟模式。我们希望讨论的是,是应当侧重于AI道德还是更广义地说,应当侧重于AI系统的质量,为AI系统的发展提出成熟模式。