The European Union is likely to introduce among the first, most stringent, and most comprehensive AI regulatory regimes of the world's major jurisdictions. In this report, we ask whether the EU's upcoming regulation for AI will diffuse globally, producing a so-called "Brussels Effect". Building on and extending Anu Bradford's work, we outline the mechanisms by which such regulatory diffusion may occur. We consider both the possibility that the EU's AI regulation will incentivise changes in products offered in non-EU countries (a de facto Brussels Effect) and the possibility it will influence regulation adopted by other jurisdictions (a de jure Brussels Effect). Focusing on the proposed EU AI Act, we tentatively conclude that both de facto and de jure Brussels effects are likely for parts of the EU regulatory regime. A de facto effect is particularly likely to arise in large US tech companies with AI systems that the AI Act terms "high-risk". We argue that the upcoming regulation might be particularly important in offering the first and most influential operationalisation of what it means to develop and deploy trustworthy or human-centred AI. If the EU regime is likely to see significant diffusion, ensuring it is well-designed becomes a matter of global importance.
翻译:欧盟很可能在世界上主要管辖区的第一批、最严格和最全面的AI监管制度中引入最严格和最全面的AI监管制度。 在本报告中,我们询问欧盟即将出台的AI监管条例是否会在全球扩散,产生所谓的“布鲁塞尔效应 ” 。 我们根据并扩展了Anu Bradford的工作,概述了进行这种监管推广的机制。我们认为,欧盟的AI监管条例有可能激励非欧盟国家提供的产品的变化(事实上的布鲁塞尔效应),并有可能影响其他管辖区通过的监管(法律上的布鲁塞尔效应 ) 。 侧重于拟议的欧盟AI法案,我们暂时得出结论认为,事实上和法律上对欧盟监管制度的某些部分都可能产生布鲁塞尔效应。 具有AI法案所称为“高风险”的AI系统的大型美国技术公司尤其可能产生事实上的效果。 我们认为,即将出台的监管条例可能对于首次和最有影响力地实施发展和部署可靠或以人为本的AI的意义特别重要。如果欧盟制度有可能看到显著的推广,那么它就会成为全球重要事项。