Facebook, the largest social networking site in the world, has overcome the structural barriers that historically constrain individuals to reach out to different others. Through the platform, people from all walks of life and virtually any location can develop diverse friendships online. However, friendships on Facebook have been as segregated as friendships in real life. This research sought to understand why the leading social networking site intended to 'bring the world closer together' retains segregated friendship. In doing so, we employed a series of agent-based simulations based on the Framework for Intergroup Relations and Multiple Affiliations Networks (FIRMAN). As demonstrated, Facebook has primarily enhanced users' capacity to maintain a larger number of friendships (tie capacity), while has done little to empower users' ability to accept diversity and befriend different others (tie outreachability). Facebook must focus on the latter should they truly wish to contribute to the development of a more inclusive society. While in this study we focus on ethnically segregated friendship on Facebook, we argue that the same explanation may also hold for racially and ideologically segregated friendships on other bi-directional social networking sites.
翻译:Facebook是世界上最大的社交网络网站,它克服了历史上限制个人接触不同他人的结构性障碍。 通过这个平台,来自各行各业的人和几乎任何地点的人都可以在网上发展不同的友谊。然而,Facebook上的友谊与真实生活中的友谊一样隔离。这一研究试图了解为什么主要社交网络网站“让世界更紧密地联系在一起”会保持隔离的友谊。在这样做的过程中,我们利用了一系列基于群体间关系和多重联系网络框架的代理模拟。正如所显示的那样,Facebook主要增强了用户维持更多友谊(双向能力)的能力,但几乎没有赋予用户接受多样性和成为不同朋友的能力(双向外联能力)。如果他们真的希望为一个更具包容性的社会的发展做出贡献,Facebook必须把重点放在后者上。在这项研究中,我们把种族隔离的友谊放在脸书上,但我们认为,同样的解释也可能支持其他双向社会网络网站的种族和意识形态隔离友谊。