This work investigates the use of interactively updated label suggestions to improve upon the efficiency of gathering annotations on the task of opinion mining in German Covid-19 social media data. We develop guidelines to conduct a controlled annotation study with social science students and find that suggestions from a model trained on a small, expert-annotated dataset already lead to a substantial improvement - in terms of inter-annotator agreement(+.14 Fleiss' $\kappa$) and annotation quality - compared to students that do not receive any label suggestions. We further find that label suggestions from interactively trained models do not lead to an improvement over suggestions from a static model. Nonetheless, our analysis of suggestion bias shows that annotators remain capable of reflecting upon the suggested label in general. Finally, we confirm the quality of the annotated data in transfer learning experiments between different annotator groups. To facilitate further research in opinion mining on social media data, we release our collected data consisting of 200 expert and 2,785 student annotations.
翻译:这项工作调查了使用互动更新标签建议提高德国Covid-19社交媒体数据中意见采矿任务说明收集效率的效率,我们制定了指导方针,对社会科学学生进行有控制的批注研究,发现在小型、专家附加说明的数据集方面受过培训的模型提出的建议已经导致在同未收到任何标签建议的学生相比,在跨咨询协议(+.14 Fleiss' $\kappa$)和批注质量方面大大改进。我们进一步发现,互动培训模型的标签建议不会导致对静态模型的建议的改进。然而,我们对建议偏向性的分析表明,批注者仍然能够反映建议的一般标签。最后,我们确认不同批注小组之间转让学习实验的附加数据的质量。为了便利对社会媒体数据的意见挖掘的进一步研究,我们发布了我们收集到的由200名专家和2 785名学生组成的数据。