The transition to prescriptive maintenance in manufacturing is critically constrained by a dependence on predictive models. These models tend to rely on spurious correlations rather than identifying the true causal drivers of failures, often leading to costly misdiagnoses and ineffective interventions. This fundamental limitation results in a key-challenge: while we can predict that a failure may occur, we lack a systematic method to understand why a failure occurs, thereby providing the basis for identifying the most effective intervention. This paper proposes a model based on causal machine learning to bridge this gap. Our objective is to move beyond diagnosis to active prescription by simulating and evaluating potential fixes toward optimizing KPIs such as Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE). For this purpose a pre-trained causal foundation model is used as a "what-if" model to estimate the effects of potential fixes. By measuring the causal effect of each intervention on system-level KPIs, it provides a data-driven ranking of actions to recommend at the production line. This process not only identifies root causes but also quantifies their operational impact. The model is evaluated using semi-synthetic manufacturing data and compared with a baseline machine learning model. This paper sets the technical basis for a robust prescriptive maintenance framework, allowing engineers to test potential solutions in a causal environment to make more effective operational decisions and reduce costly downtimes.
翻译:制造业向规范性维护的转型,关键受限于对预测模型的依赖。这些模型往往依赖于虚假相关性,而非识别故障的真正因果驱动因素,常导致代价高昂的误诊和无效干预。这一根本局限引发了一个核心挑战:尽管我们能预测故障可能发生,却缺乏系统性的方法来理解故障为何发生,从而为识别最有效的干预措施提供依据。本文提出一种基于因果机器学习的模型来弥合这一差距。我们的目标是通过模拟和评估潜在修复方案以优化整体设备效率等关键绩效指标,从而超越诊断,迈向主动处方。为此,我们使用一个预训练的因果基础模型作为“假设分析”模型,以估计潜在修复方案的效果。通过测量每项干预对系统级关键绩效指标的因果效应,该模型提供了数据驱动的行动排序,以在生产线上推荐实施。此过程不仅能识别根本原因,还能量化其操作影响。该模型使用半合成制造数据进行了评估,并与基线机器学习模型进行了比较。本文为构建稳健的规范性维护框架奠定了技术基础,使工程师能够在因果环境中测试潜在解决方案,以做出更有效的操作决策并减少代价高昂的停机时间。