We examine opinion dynamics in multi-agent games. Each agent forms an opinion describing its preferences among multiple available strategies and exchanges its opinion with other agents. We explain how the model allows the agents to make rational and reciprocal decisions on strategy selection, both of which are key features observed in human decision making. Using bifurcation analysis, we establish how the agents switch between rational and reciprocal decision making, and we use the results to explain how cooperation emerges in the prisoner's dilemma. Using numerical examples, we illustrate the results of the bifurcation analysis and identify important aspects of rational and reciprocal decision making.
翻译:我们审视多试剂游戏的动态。每个代理商都形成一种意见,描述其在多种现有战略中的偏好,并与其他代理商交流看法。我们解释该模型如何使代理商就战略选择做出合理和对等的决定,两者都是人类决策中观察到的关键特征。我们通过两重分析,确定代理商如何在合理和对等决策之间转换,我们利用结果解释在囚犯的困境中如何出现合作。我们用数字例子来说明两重分析的结果,并找出合理和对等决策的重要方面。