The controversy about statistical significance vs. scientific relevance is more than 100 years old. But still nowadays null hypothesis significance testing is considered as gold standard in many empirical fields from economics and social sciences over psychology to medicine, and small $p$-values are often the key to publish in journals of high scientific reputation. I highlight, illustrate and discuss potential pitfalls of statistical significance testing on three occasions.
翻译:有关统计重要性和科学相关性的争议已经存在100多年了。 但如今,在从经济学和社会科学到心理学到医学的许多经验领域,无效意义的测试仍被视为黄金标准,而小额价值往往是在高科学名声杂志上发表的关键。 我三次强调、说明和讨论统计重要性测试的潜在缺陷。