Box score statistics are the baseline measures of performance for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball. Between the 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 seasons, NCAA teams performed better at home compared to on the road in nearly all box score statistics across both genders and all three divisions. Using box score data from over 100,000 games spanning the three divisions for both women and men, we examine the factors underlying this discrepancy. The prevalence of neutral location games in the NCAA provides an additional angle through which to examine the gaps in box score statistic performance, which we believe has been underutilized in existing literature. We also estimate a regression model to quantify the home court advantages for box score statistics after controlling for other factors such as number of possessions, and team strength. Additionally, we examine the biases of scorekeepers and referees. We present evidence that scorekeepers tend to have greater home team biases when observing men compared to women, higher divisions compared to lower divisions, and stronger teams compared to weaker teams. Finally, we present statistically significant results indicating referee decisions are impacted by attendance, with larger crowds resulting in greater bias in favor of the home team.
翻译:在2011-2012年和2015-2016年赛季期间,全国残疾人协会团队在家里的表现优于在道路上的表现,几乎所有男女和所有三个司的全方位得分统计都是如此。利用跨越三个司的10万多场比赛的方框得分数据,我们审视了造成这一差异的因素。全国残疾人协会中中立地点游戏的普及性为检查框分数统计业绩差距提供了另一个角度,我们认为现有文献对此没有充分利用。我们还估算了一个回归模型,用以量化家庭法院在控制财产数量和团队实力等其他因素之后对箱分数统计的优势。此外,我们研究了记分员和裁判员的偏向。我们提出的证据表明,计分员在观察男性与女性相比、较高分数与较低分数相比、以及较强的队与较弱的队相比,对家庭队的偏向往往更大。最后,我们提出了具有统计意义的结果,表明上述决定受到出席率的影响,因为更多的人群对家庭队的偏向。