Although machine learning (ML) is widely used in practice, little is known about practitioners' actual understanding of potential security challenges. In this work, we close this substantial gap in the literature and contribute a qualitative study focusing on developers' mental models of the ML pipeline and potentially vulnerable components. Studying mental models has helped in other security fields to discover root causes or improve risk communication. Our study reveals four characteristic ranges in mental models of industrial practitioners. The first range concerns the intertwined relationship of adversarial machine learning (AML) and classical security. The second range describes structural and functional components. The third range expresses individual variations of mental models, which are neither explained by the application nor by the educational background of the corresponding subjects. The fourth range corresponds to the varying levels of technical depth, which are however not determined by our subjects' level of knowledge. Our characteristic ranges have implications for the integration of AML into corporate workflows, security enhancing tools for practitioners, and creating appropriate regulatory frameworks for AML.
翻译:虽然在实践中广泛使用机器学习(ML),但实际操作者对潜在安全挑战的实际理解却知之甚少。在这项工作中,我们缩小了文献中的这一巨大差距,并开展了一项定性研究,重点是开发者对ML管道的心理模型和潜在的脆弱组成部分。研究精神模型在其他安全领域有助于发现根源或改善风险交流。我们的研究揭示了工业从业人员心理模型的四个特点范围。第一个范围涉及对抗性机器学习(AML)和古典安全之间的相互联系。第二个范围描述结构和功能组成部分。第三个范围表示精神模型的个别变异,这些变异既未通过应用,也未根据相应科目的教育背景加以解释。第四个范围相当于不同的技术深度水平,然而这些程度并非由我们学员的知识水平所决定。我们的特点范围对将AML纳入企业工作流程、加强从业人员安全的工具以及建立适当的反洗钱监管框架具有影响。