Studies evaluating bikeability usually compute spatial indicators shaping cycling conditions and conflate them in a quantitative index. Much research involves site visits or conventional geospatial approaches, and few studies have leveraged street view imagery (SVI) for conducting virtual audits. These have assessed a limited range of aspects, and not all have been automated using computer vision (CV). Furthermore, studies have not yet zeroed in on gauging the usability of these technologies thoroughly. We investigate, with experiments at a fine spatial scale and across multiple geographies (Singapore and Tokyo), whether we can use SVI and CV to assess bikeability comprehensively. Extending related work, we develop an exhaustive index of bikeability composed of 34 indicators. The results suggest that SVI and CV are adequate to evaluate bikeability in cities comprehensively. As they outperformed non-SVI counterparts by a wide margin, SVI indicators are also found to be superior in assessing urban bikeability, and potentially can be used independently, replacing traditional techniques. However, the paper exposes some limitations, suggesting that the best way forward is combining both SVI and non-SVI approaches. The new bikeability index presents a contribution in transportation and urban analytics, and it is scalable to assess cycling appeal widely.
翻译:多数研究涉及现场访问或传统的地理空间方法,很少有研究利用街头视觉图像(SVI)进行虚拟审计。这些研究评估了有限的各个方面,并非所有方面都使用计算机视觉(CV)实现自动化。此外,在彻底衡量这些技术的可用性方面,SVI指标还没有达到零点。我们通过空间规模和跨多个地理地理区(新加坡和东京)的试验,调查我们是否可以使用SVI和CV来全面评估自行车可操作性。我们扩大了相关工作,制定了由34项指标组成的详尽的自行车可操作性指数。结果显示,SVI和CV足以全面评价城市的自行车可操作性。由于SVI和CV在广泛范围内优于非SVI的可操作性,因此发现SVI指标在评估城市自行车可操作性方面也比较高,而且有可能独立使用,从而取代传统技术。然而,文件暴露了一些局限性,表明最佳的前进方式是将SVI和非SVI和非SVI方法结合起来。新的自行车可移动性指数对城市交通和自行车性具有广泛的吸引力。