Data shift robustness is an active research topic, however, it has been primarily investigated from a fully supervised perspective, and robustness of zero-shot learning (ZSL) models have been largely neglected. In this paper, we present a novel analysis on the robustness of discriminative ZSL to image corruptions. We leverage the well-known label embedding model and subject it to a large set of common corruptions and defenses. In order to realize the corruption analysis, we curate and release the first ZSL corruption robustness datasets SUN-C, CUB-C and AWA2-C. We analyse our results by taking into account the dataset characteristics, class imbalance, class transition trends between seen and unseen classes and the discrepancies between ZSL and GZSL performances. Our results show that discriminative ZSL suffer from corruptions and this trend is further exacerbated by the severe class imbalance and model weakness inherent in ZSL methods. We then combine our findings with those based on adversarial attacks in ZSL, and highlight the different effects of corruptions and adversarial examples, such as the pseudo-robustness effect present under adversarial attacks. We also obtain new strong baselines for the label embedding model with certain corruption robustness enhancement methods. Finally, our experiments show that although existing methods to improve robustness somewhat work for ZSL models, they do not produce a tangible effect.
翻译:数据转换的稳健性是一个积极的研究课题,然而,它主要是从充分监督的角度来调查的,零点学习模式的稳健性在很大程度上被忽略。在本文件中,我们对歧视性ZSL的稳健性进行了新颖的分析,分析有区别的ZSL和GZSL业绩之间的差异。我们利用众所周知的标签嵌入模式,将其置于大量共同的腐败和防御之下。为了实现腐败分析,我们整理并发布首个ZSL的腐败稳健性数据集,我们首先从充分监督的角度,然后公布首个ZSL的腐败稳健性数据集,CUB-C和AW2-C。我们分析我们的结果时要考虑到数据集的特点、阶级不平衡、可见和不可见的阶级之间的阶级过渡趋势以及ZSL和GZSL的表现之间的差异。我们的结果表明,歧视性ZSL受到腐败的困扰,而这种趋势又由于ZSL方法固有的严重阶级不平衡和模式弱点而进一步加剧。我们随后将我们的调查结果与基于ZSL、C和AWAW2-C的对立式攻击的结果结合起来,并强调腐败和对抗性实例的不同影响,例如假的模型的坏性模型的坏性效果,而不是强健健健的基质性效应,我们最后将改进的基底的实验。我们获得了某种腐化的基底的实验性标签。