People are frequently required to send documents, forms, or other materials containing sensitive data (e.g., personal information, medical records, financial data) to remote parties, sometimes without a formal procedure to do so securely. The specific transmission mechanisms end up relying on the knowledge and preferences of the parties involved. Through two online surveys ($n=60$ and $n=250$), we explore the various methods used to transmit sensitive documents, as well as the perceived risk and satisfaction with those methods. We find that users are more likely to recognize risk to data-at-rest after receipt (but not at the sender, namely, themselves). When not using an online portal provided by the recipient, participants primarily envision transmitting sensitive documents in person or via email, and have little experience using secure, privacy-preserving alternatives. Despite recognizing general risks, participants express high privacy satisfaction and convenience with actually experienced situations. These results suggest opportunities to design new solutions to promote securely sending sensitive materials, perhaps as new utilities within standard email workflows.
翻译:通常要求人们向边远当事人发送载有敏感数据的文件、表格或其他材料(如个人信息、医疗记录、财务数据等),有时没有正式程序来这样做,具体传输机制最终依赖于相关当事人的知识和偏好。我们通过两次在线调查(n=60美元和n=250美元),探索用于传输敏感文件的各种方法,以及所察觉的风险和对这些方法的满意度。我们发现用户更可能发现数据收到后(但不在发送者本身)会面临被检索的风险。在不使用接收者提供的在线门户时,参与者主要设想亲自或通过电子邮件传输敏感文件,并且几乎没有使用安全、隐私保护替代办法的经验。尽管认识到一般风险,但参与者对实际经历的情况表示高度的隐私满意和方便。这些结果表明,有可能设计新的解决方案,促进安全发送敏感材料,也许作为标准电子邮件工作流程中的新的公用设施。