Background: There is a constant discussion regarding whether the ICSE Technical Research track is accepting too many contributions of some type and too few of some other type. Questions: Are ICSE and the contributions it is seeing well aligned with what is important for bringing software engineering forward? Method: 26 expert interviews with senior members of the ICSE community, evaluated qualitatively and reported with many quotations. Results: About three quarters of the respondents are not generally happy with ICSE's alignment. Two specific complaints that recur frequently concern a) many low-relevance contributions making it into the program and b) several types of high-relevance contributions hardly seen in the ICSE program.
翻译：背景:人们不断讨论理事会技术研究轨道是否接受过多的某类捐款,而其他种类的捐款则太少。 问题:理事会是否接受过多的某类捐款,以及理事会是否认为这些捐款与推进软件工程的重要性完全吻合?方法:26次专家与理事会高级成员面谈,对质量进行评估,并用许多引文进行报告。结果:大约四分之三的受访者普遍不满意理事会的一致。 反复出现的两个具体投诉经常涉及:(a)许多低相关性捐款使方案受益;(b) 理事会方案很少看到几类高价值捐款。
相关内容
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员