How do inter-organizational networks emerge? Accounting for interdependence among ties while studying tie formation is one of the key challenges in this area of research. We address this challenge using an equilibrium framework where firms' decisions to form links with other firms are modeled as a strategic game. In this game, firms weigh the costs and benefits of establishing a relationship with other firms and form ties if their net payoffs are positive. We characterize the equilibrium networks as exponential random graphs (ERGM), and we estimate the firms' payoffs using a Bayesian approach. To demonstrate the usefulness of our approach, we apply the framework to a co-investment network of venture capital firms in the medical device industry. The equilibrium framework allows researchers to draw economic interpretation from parameter estimates of the ERGM Model. We learn that firms rely on their joint partners (transitivity) and prefer to form ties with firms similar to themselves (homophily). These results hold after controlling for the interdependence among ties. Another, critical advantage of a structural approach is that it allows us to simulate the effects of economic shocks or policy counterfactuals. We test two such policy shocks, namely, firm entry and regulatory change. We show how new firms' entry or a regulatory shock of minimum capital requirements increase the co-investment network's density and clustering.
翻译:如何出现组织间网络? 考虑联系之间的相互依存关系,同时研究领带形成关系,是这一研究领域的关键挑战之一。我们利用平衡框架应对这一挑战,在均衡框架中,公司决定与其他公司建立联系的决定可作为一种战略游戏的模式。在这一游戏中,公司权衡与其他公司建立关系的成本和效益,如果其净回报是积极的,则形成联系。我们将均衡网络称为指数随机图(ERGM),我们用巴伊西亚方法估计公司的报酬。为了证明我们的方法的效用,我们将该框架应用于医疗设备行业风险资本公司的共同投资网络。平衡框架使研究人员能够从ERGM模型的参数估计中得出经济解释。我们了解到,公司依赖其联合伙伴(流动性),并愿意与其他公司建立联系,如果其净回报是正面的,则这些结果在控制各种联系之后保持不变。另一个关键优势是,它使我们能够模拟经济冲击或政策反事实的影响。我们测试了两种政策冲击,即企业进入和监管性变化。我们发现,公司进入和监管性投资网络的最小程度是如何提高资本的进入率。