We carry out a detailed analysis of the security advice coding method (SAcoding) of Barrera et al. (2022), which is designed to analyze security advice in the sense of measuring actionability and categorizing advice items as practices, policies, principles, or outcomes. The main part of our analysis explores the extent to which a second coder's assignment of codes to advice items agrees with that of a first, for a dataset of 1013 security advice items nominally addressing Internet of Things devices. More broadly, we seek a deeper understanding of the soundness and utility of the SAcoding method, and the degree to which it meets the design goal of reducing subjectivity in assigning codes to security advice items. Our analysis results in suggestions for minor changes to the coding tree methodology, and some recommendations. We believe the coding tree approach may be of interest for analysis of qualitative data beyond security advice datasets alone.
翻译:我们详细分析了Barrera等人(2022年)的安保咨询编码方法(Sacoding),目的是从衡量可操作性的角度分析安保咨询,并将咨询项目分类为做法、政策、原则或结果;我们分析的主要部分探讨了第二名编码员指定咨询项目代码与第一组代码一致的程度,即1013个安全咨询项目数据集名义上涉及物联网设备;更广泛而言,我们寻求更深入地了解SAcoding方法的健全性和实用性,以及该方法达到降低为安保咨询项目分配代码的主观性的设计目标的程度;我们的分析结果是提出了对树编码方法进行小小改动的建议,以及一些建议;我们认为,编码树方法对于仅分析安全咨询数据集以外的质量数据可能很有意义。