When screening for rare diseases in large populations, conducting individual tests can be expensive and time-consuming. In group testing, individuals are pooled and tested together. If a group is tested negative, then all individuals in that group are declared negative. Otherwise, it is concluded that at least one individual in that group is positive. Group testing can be used to classify the individuals with respect to their disease status, to estimate the prevalence in the target population, or to conduct a hypothesis test on the unknown prevalence. In this work, we consider both the case when the population is not stratified and when it is stratified, the latter leading to multiple test problems. We define single- and two-stage randomized $p$-values for a model pertaining to the proportion of positive individuals in binomial distribution and in group testing. Randomized $p$-values are less conservative compared to non-randomized $p$-values under the null hypothesis, but they are stochastically not smaller under the alternative. We show that the proposed $p$-values are valid in the binomial model. Testing individuals in pools for a fixed number of tests improves the power of the tests based on the $p$-values. The power of the tests based on randomized $p$-values as a function of the sample size is also investigated. Simulations and real data analysis are used to compare and analyze the different considered $p$-values.
翻译:当在大量人群中筛选稀有疾病时,进行个人测试可能费用昂贵而且耗时。在集体测试中,个人被集合在一起进行测试。如果对一个群体进行测试为负数,那么该群体中的所有个人都被宣布为负数。否则,结论是该群体中至少有一个人是正数。群体测试可以用来对个人进行疾病状况分类,估计目标人群中的流行率,或对未知流行率进行假设测试。在这项工作中,我们既考虑人口不分层、分层时,也考虑个人一起进行测试,后者导致多重测试问题。我们定义了单阶段和两阶段随机化的美元,该群体中的所有个人都被宣布为负数。随机化的美元价值与无效假设下的非随机化的美元值相比,并不那么,但在其他情况下,我们考虑两种情况:当人口没有被分层分层分层,而分层处理后,就会导致多重测试问题。我们为一个在集体中被考虑的单阶段和两阶段随机随机的美元价值,用于与正数个人在双组分布分布分布中的比例比例和群体测试有关的模型分析功能,随机的美元比值也改进了所使用的货币值。根据对美元进行抽样测试的数值进行测试的数值的数值分析功能改进了使用。