Recent AI governance research has focused heavily on the analysis of strategy papers and ethics guidelines for AI published by national governments and international bodies. Meanwhile, subnational institutions have also published documents on Artificial Intelligence, yet these have been largely absent from policy analyses. This is surprising because AI is connected to many policy areas, such as economic or research policy, where the competences are already distributed between the national and subnational level. To better understand the current dynamics of AI governance, it is essential to consider the context of policy making beyond the federal government. Although AI may be considered a new policy field, it is created, contested and ultimately shaped within existing political structures and dynamics. We therefore argue that more attention should be dedicated to subnational efforts to shape AI and present initial findings from our case study of Germany. Analyzing AI as a policy field on different levels of government will contribute to a better understanding of the developments and implementations of AI strategies in different national contexts.
翻译:最近大赦国际的治理研究主要侧重于分析各国政府和国际组织出版的关于大赦国际的战略文件和道德准则;同时,国家以下各级机构还出版了关于人工情报的文件,但政策分析中基本上没有这些文件;这令人惊讶,因为大赦国际与许多政策领域有关,如经济或研究政策,其权限已经在国家和国家以下一级分配;为了更好地了解大赦国际治理的当前动态,必须考虑联邦政府以外的政策制定背景;尽管大赦国际可被视为一个新的政策领域,但它是在现有政治结构和动态中创建、争议并最终形成的;因此,我们主张应更多地关注国家以下各级为塑造大赦国际所作的努力,并提出我们对德国的案例研究的初步结论;将大赦国际作为各级政府的政策领域加以分析,将有助于更好地了解不同国情下大赦国际战略的发展和执行情况。