We analyze the forces that explain inflation using a panel of 122 countries from 1997 to 2015 with 37 regressors. 98 models motivated by economic theory are compared to a gradient boosting algorithm, non-linearities and structural breaks are considered. We show that the typical estimation methods are likely to lead to fallacious policy conclusions which motivates the use of a new approach that we propose in this paper. The boosting algorithm outperforms theory-based models. We confirm that energy prices are important but what really matters for inflation is their non-linear interplay with energy rents. Demographic developments also make a difference. Globalization and technology, public debt, central bank independence and political characteristics are less relevant. GDP per capita is more relevant than the output gap, credit growth more than M2 growth.
翻译:我们用一个由122个国家组成的小组来分析1997年至2015年通货膨胀的原因,该小组有37个递减者。98个以经济理论为动机的模型与梯度加速算法、非线性和结构性断裂进行了比较。我们发现,典型的估算方法可能会导致错误的政策结论,从而促使我们在本文件中提出的新办法的使用。推高算法优于理论模型。我们确认,能源价格很重要,但真正关系到通货膨胀的是它们与能源租金的非线性相互作用。人口发展也产生了变化。全球化和技术、公共债务、中央银行独立和政治特点都不太重要。人均GDP比产出差距、信贷增长大于M2增长更重要。