As a reaction to the high infectiousness and lethality of the COVID-19 virus, countries around the world have adopted drastic policy measures to contain the pandemic. However, it remains unclear which effect these measures, so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), have on the spread of the virus. In this article, we use machine learning and apply drift detection methods in a novel way to measure the effectiveness of policy interventions: We analyze the effect of NPIs on the development of daily case numbers of COVID-19 across 9 European countries and 28 US states. Our analysis shows that it takes more than two weeks on average until NPIs show a significant effect on the number of new cases. We then analyze how characteristics of each country or state, e.g., decisiveness regarding NPIs, climate or population density, influence the time lag until NPIs show their effectiveness. In our analysis, especially the timing of school closures reveals a significant effect on the development of the pandemic. This information is crucial for policy makers confronted with difficult decisions to trade off strict containment of the virus with NPI relief.
翻译:作为对COVID-19病毒高度传染性和致命性的一种反应,世界各国采取了严厉的政策措施来遏制这一流行病,然而,仍然不清楚这些措施,即所谓的非药物干预,对病毒的传播有何影响。在本条中,我们使用机器学习和采用漂移探测方法,以新的方式衡量政策干预的效果:我们分析了NPI对9个欧洲国家和28个美国国家COVID-19每日病例数量发展的影响。我们的分析表明,平均需要两周以上的时间,直到NPI对新病例数量产生重大影响。然后我们分析了每个国家或国家的特点,例如关于NPIs、气候或人口密度的决定性因素,如何影响到NPIs显示其有效性的时间滞后。在我们的分析中,特别是学校关闭的时机表明,该流行病的发展受到重大影响。这一信息对于面临艰难决定的决策者来说,对于用NPI救济来严格控制病毒至关重要。