A tweet from popular entertainer and businesswoman, Rihanna, bringing attention to farmers' protests around Delhi set off heightened activity on Indian social media. An immediate consequence was the weighing in by Indian politicians, entertainers, media and other influencers on the issue. In this paper, we use data from Twitter and an archive of debunked misinformation stories to understand some of the patterns around influencer engagement with a political issue. We found that more followed influencers were less likely to come out in support of the tweet. We also find that the later engagement of major influencers on the side of the government's position shows suggestion's of collusion. Irrespective of their position on the issue, influencers who engaged saw a significant rise in their following after their tweets. While a number of tweets thanked Rihanna for raising awareness on the issue, she was systematically trolled on the grounds of her gender, race, nationality and religion. Finally, we observed how misinformation existing prior to the tweet set up the grounds for alternative narratives that emerged.
翻译:印度政治人物、艺人、媒体和其他影响力人物对此议题的权衡。本文使用来自Twitter的数据和被揭发的不实故事档案来了解影响者参与政治议题的某些模式。我们发现更多受关注的影响力人物支持推文的可能性较小。我们也发现,政府立场一方的主要影响力人物后来的参与表明他们相互勾结。不管他们在这一问题上的立场如何,在推文发表后,影响力人物的追随者们都看到其追随者大幅上升。一些推文感谢Rihanna提高了对这一问题的认识,但她却因性别、种族、国籍和宗教原因被系统地吸引。最后,我们注意到在推文之前存在的误导如何为出现替代叙事的理由。