Creative processes are widely believed to involve the generation of multiple, discrete, well-defined possibilities followed by exploration and selection. An alternative, inspired by parallel distributed processing models of associative memory, is that creativity involves the merging and interference of memory items resulting in a single cognitive structure that is ill-defined, and can thus be said to exist in a state of potentiality. We tested this hypothesis in an experiment in which participants were interrupted midway through solving an analogy problem and asked what they were thinking in terms of a solution. Naive judges categorized their responses as AP if there was evidence of merging solution sources from memory resulting in an ill-defined idea, and SM if there was no evidence of this. Data from frequency counts and mean number of SM versus AP judgments supported the hypothesis that midway through creative processing an idea is in a potentiality state.
翻译:人们广泛认为,创造性过程涉及产生多种、互不关联的、明确界定的可能性,然后进行探索和选择。另一种办法是,在平行分布式处理模式的启发下,利用联合内存,创造性涉及合并和干扰记忆物品,造成单一的认知结构,定义不明确,因此可以说存在潜力状态。我们在试验中测试了这一假设,在试验中,参与者在解决一个类比问题时中途中断,并询问他们从某种解决办法的角度考虑什么。当有证据表明记忆中的解决办法来源合并,从而产生一种定义错误的想法时,见识法官将他们的答复归类为AP,如果没有证据证明这一点,SM,SM。从频率计数和SM与AP判决的平均数量中得出的数据支持了一个假设,即通过创造性处理,一种想法处于潜在状态。