The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is a standard aggregate indicator of the overall severity of multiple injuries to the human body. This score is calculated by summing the squares of the three highest values of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) grades across six body regions of a trauma victim. Despite its widespread usage over the past four decades, little is known in the (mostly medical) literature on the subject about the axiomatic and statistical properties of this quadratic aggregation score. To bridge this gap, the present paper studies the ISS from the perspective of recent advances in decision science. We demonstrate some statistical and axiomatic properties of the ISS as a multicrtieria aggregation procedure. Our study highlights some unintended, undesirable properties that stem from arbitrary choices in its design and that call lead to bias in its use as a patient triage criterion.
翻译:伤害重度分数(ISS)是衡量人体多重伤害总体严重程度的标准综合指标,计算这一分数的方法是,在创伤受害人的6个身体区域中,将减缩伤害等级的3个最高等级的平方打成平方,尽管在过去40年中广泛使用该分数,但在关于这个四重体积分数的不言理和统计特性的(主要是医学)文献中却鲜为人知。为弥补这一差距,本文件从决策科学最新进展的角度对国际空间站进行了研究。我们把国际空间站的一些统计和不言理特性作为多分层汇总程序加以展示。我们的研究突出了一些无意的、不可取的特性,这些特性源自于设计中的任意选择,并导致将它作为病人三重标准使用时出现偏差。