When we view visualizations, we not only have a visual representation of the data, but also a verbal one. Recent work has shown that these visual representations of data can be biased, such that the position of a line in a chart will be consistently underestimated. But are the verbal representations of position encodings also biased in the same manner, or is this a purely visual bias that can be mitigated with verbal context? We explored the bias in position reproductions for simple uniform lines for both visual and verbal representations. We find that the direction of the bias changed depending on the response modality, with visual reproductions showing a position underestimation while verbal responses showed overestimation. This finding indicates that, even for simple line charts, biases are still present for both visual and verbal representations, although the directionality of this bias depends on the modality.
翻译:当我们查看可视化时,我们不仅对数据有直观的描述,而且有一个口头的描述。最近的工作显示,这些对数据的直观描述可能存在偏差,因此图表中线的位置会一直被低估。但是,位置编码的口头表述还是同样有偏差,还是这种纯粹的直观偏差可以通过口头背景来减轻?我们探讨了视觉和口头表述的简单统一线在位置复制方面的偏差。我们发现,视像显示偏差的方向取决于反应模式,视觉复制显示一个低估位置,而口头答复则显示高估位置。这一发现表明,即使简单的直观和口头表述都存在偏差,尽管这种偏差的方向取决于方式。