Shared autonomy teleoperation can guarantee safety, but does so by reducing the human operator's control authority, which can lead to reduced levels of human-robot agreement and user satisfaction. This paper presents a novel haptic shared autonomy teleoperation paradigm that uses haptic feedback to inform the user about the inner state of a shared autonomy paradigm, while still guaranteeing safety. This differs from haptic shared control, which uses haptic feedback to inform the user's actions, but gives the human operator full control over the robot's actions. We conducted a user study in which twelve users flew a simulated UAV in a search-and-rescue task with no assistance or assistance provided by haptic shared control, shared autonomy, or haptic shared autonomy. All assistive teleoperation methods use control barrier functions to find a control command that is both safe and as close as possible to the human-generated control command. For assistive teleoperation conditions with haptic feedback, we apply a force to the user that is proportional to the difference between the human-generated control and the safe control. We find that haptic shared autonomy improves the user's task performance and satisfaction. We also find that haptic feedback in assistive teleoperation can improve the user's situational awareness. Finally, results show that adding haptic feedback to shared-autonomy teleoperation can improve human-robot agreement.
翻译:共享自主 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 协议 模式 。 本文展示了一个新颖的 偶然 共享 共享 共享 共享 共享 协议 模式 模式, 使用 偶然 共享 模式 向用户通报 共享 模式 的内部状态, 同时仍然 保障 安全 。 这不同于 偶然 共享 控制, 使用 随机 反馈 告知 用户 行动, 但 赋予 人操作 人操作 完全控制 机器人 行动 。 我们进行了 用户 研究, 12 用户 在 搜索 和 回收 任务 协议 中, 没有 协助或协助 。 所有协助 共享 共享 协议 都使用 控制 障碍 功能 寻找 安全 控制, 尽可能 接近 人类生成 控制 指令 的 。 为了协助 远程 帮助 用户 共享 协议, 我们发现 能够 改善 共享 用户 共享 协议 。