Visualizations today are used across a wide range of languages and cultures. Yet the extent to which language impacts how we reason about data and visualizations remains unclear. In this paper, we explore the intersection of visualization and language through a cross-language study on estimative probability tasks with icon-array visualizations. Across Arabic, English, French, German, and Mandarin, n = 50 participants per language both chose probability expressions - e.g. likely, probable - to describe icon-array visualizations (Vis-to-Expression), and drew icon-array visualizations to match a given expression (Expression-to-Vis). Results suggest that there is no clear one-to-one mapping of probability expressions and associated visual ranges between languages. Several translated expressions fell significantly above or below the range of the corresponding English expressions. Compared to other languages, French and German respondents appear to exhibit high levels of consistency between the visualizations they drew and the words they chose. Participants across languages used similar words when describing scenarios above 80% chance, with more variance in expressions targeting mid-range and lower values. We discuss how these results suggest potential differences in the expressiveness of language as it relates to visualization interpretation and design goals, as well as practical implications for translation efforts and future studies at the intersection of languages, culture, and visualization. Experiment data, source code, and analysis scripts are available at the following repository: https://osf.io/g5d4r/.
翻译:今天的可视化在多种语言和文化中使用。然而,语言影响我们如何理解数据和可视化的程度仍然不明确。在本文中,我们探索视觉化和语言的交叉点,方法是通过对估计概率任务的跨语言研究,与图标光学直观化一起,通过图标光学直观化来研究估计概率任务。在阿拉伯文、英文、法文、德文和曼达林,n=50名参与者,每个语言都选择概率表达方式,例如,可能、可能——描述图标-阵列直观化(Vis-to-Expression),并绘制图标-阵列直观化与特定表达方式相匹配(Expression-to-vision)。结果显示,没有清晰的一对一的概率表达方式和不同语言之间的相关视觉范围。一些翻译的表达方式大大高于或低于相应的英语表达方式的范围。与其他语言相比,法语和德语答卷者似乎表现出高度的可视化和他们选择的字句的一致性。语言的参与者在描述80%以上情景时使用了相似的词源,在表达方式上更多差异,在中和较低数值的表达方式上,在视觉分析中和视觉分析中,我们讨论这些结果,这些结果,作为视觉研究的可判读化结果,作为实际理解中的潜在和交叉分析是如何。