We consider the problem of implementing a fixed social choice function between multiple players (which takes as input a type $t_i$ from each player $i$ and outputs an outcome $f(t_1,\ldots, t_n)$), in which each player must be incentivized to follow the protocol. In particular, we study the communication requirements of a protocol which: (a) implements $f$, (b) implements $f$ and computes payments that make it ex-post incentive compatible (EPIC) to follow the protocol, and (c) implements $f$ and computes payments in a way that makes it dominant-strategy incentive compatible (DSIC) to follow the protocol. We show exponential separations between all three of these quantities, already for just two players. That is, we first construct an $f$ such that $f$ can be implemented in communication $c$, but any EPIC implementation of $f$ (with any choice of payments) requires communication $\exp(c)$. This answers an open question of [FS09, BBS13]. Second, we construct an $f$ such that an EPIC protocol implements $f$ with communication $C$, but all DSIC implementations of $f$ require communication $\exp(C)$.
翻译:我们考虑了在多个参与者之间执行固定的社会选择功能的问题(将每个参与者的美元和产出的美元作为投入,而每个参与者的美元为美元,产出为美元),其中每个参与者必须受到激励以遵守议定书,特别是,我们研究协议的通信要求:(a) 执行美元,(b) 执行美元和计算付款,使其在事后奖励措施(EPIC)与协议兼容;(c) 执行美元和计算付款,使其在协议之后达到支配性战略奖励措施(DSIC)兼容性(DSIC),我们展示了所有这三个参与者之间的指数性分离,已经只有两个参与者。也就是说,我们首先设计了美元,这样,美元可以以通信方式执行,但任何有关美元(任何支付选择)的EPIC执行费用(EPIC)都要求支付美元(c),这是公开的问题[FSF09,BS13美元]。 其次,我们用美元通信方式构建了一个美元(SIC美元)的通信。