Citation recommendation is an important task to assist scholars in finding candidate literature to cite. Traditional studies focus on static models of recommending citations, which do not explicitly distinguish differences between papers that are caused by temporal variations. Although, some researchers have investigated chronological citation recommendation by adding time related function or modeling textual topics dynamically. These solutions can hardly cope with function generalization or cold-start problems when there is no information for user profiling or there are isolated papers never being cited. With the rise and fall of science paradigms, scientific topics tend to change and evolve over time. People would have the time preference when citing papers, since most of the theoretical basis exist in classical readings that published in old time, while new techniques are proposed in more recent papers. To explore chronological citation recommendation, this paper wants to predict the time preference based on user queries, which is a probability distribution of citing papers published in different time slices. Then, we use this time preference to re-rank the initial citation list obtained by content-based filtering. Experimental results demonstrate that task performance can be further enhanced by time preference and it's flexible to be added in other citation recommendation frameworks.
翻译:引文建议是一项重要任务,有助于学者寻找可以引用的候选文献。传统研究侧重于推荐引文的静态模式,这种模式没有明确区分时间差异造成的论文差异。虽然一些研究人员通过动态增加时间相关功能或模拟文本专题,对按时间顺序引用的建议进行了调查。这些解决方案很难解决功能一般化或“冷点启动”问题,因为没有用户特征信息或从未引用过孤立的论文。随着科学范式的兴起和衰落,科学专题往往会随着时间的变化而变化和演变。人们在引用论文时有时间偏好,因为大部分理论基础都存在于古典读物中,这些古典读物在旧时出版,而新技术则在较近的论文中提出。为探索按时间顺序引用建议,本文希望预测基于用户询问的时间偏好,即引用在不同时间切片中发表的论文的概率分布。然后,我们利用这个时间偏好重新排列通过基于内容的过滤获得的初步引文清单。实验结果表明,任务表现可以随着时间偏好而得到进一步的提高,其他引文体建议框架中可以增加灵活性。