Context: Post-release user feedback plays an integral role in improving software quality and informing new features. Given its growing importance, feedback concerning security enhancements is particularly noteworthy. In considering the rapid uptake of Android we have examined the scale and severity of Android security threats as reported by its stakeholders. Objective: We systematically mine Android issue logs to derive insights into stakeholder perceptions and experiences in relation to certain Android security issues. Method: We employed contextual analysis techniques to study issues raised regarding confidentiality and privacy in the last three major Android releases, considering covariance of stakeholder comments, and the level of consistency in user preferences and priorities. Results: Confidentiality and privacy concerns varied in severity, and were most prevalent over Jelly Bean releases. Issues raised in regard to confidentiality related mostly to access, user credentials and permission management, while privacy concerns were mainly expressed about phone locking. Community users also expressed divergent preferences for new security features, ranging from more relaxed to very strict. Conclusion: Strategies that support continuous corrective measures for both old and new Android releases would likely maintain stakeholder confidence. An approach that provides users with basic default security settings, but with the power to configure additional security features if desired, would provide the best balance for Android's wide cohort of stakeholders.
翻译:• 目标:我们系统地进行采矿和机器人发行日志,以深入了解利益攸关方对某些安非他明安全问题的看法和经验。方法:我们使用背景分析技术,研究在最后三大安非他明释放过程中提出的保密和隐私问题,同时考虑到利益攸关方意见的调和,以及用户偏好和优先事项的一致性。结果:保密和隐私问题的严重性不同,在Jelly Bean释放时最为普遍。提出的保密问题主要涉及获取、用户全权证书和许可管理,而隐私问题主要是电话锁定问题。社区用户还对新的安全特征表示了不同偏好,从更宽松到非常严格不等。结论:支持对旧释放和新释放的安非他明持续纠正措施的战略可能保持利益攸关方的信心。