Email communication between instructors and students is ubiquitous, and it could be valuable to explore ways of testing out how to make email messages more impactful. This paper explores the design space of using emails to get students to plan and reflect on starting weekly homework earlier. We deployed a series of email reminders using randomized A/B comparisons to test alternative factors in the design of these emails, providing examples of an experimental paradigm and metrics for a broader range of interventions. We also surveyed and interviewed instructors and students to compare their predictions about the effectiveness of the reminders with their actual impact. We present our results on which seemingly obvious predictions about effective emails are not borne out, despite there being evidence for further exploring these interventions, as they can sometimes motivate students to attempt their homework more often. We also present qualitative evidence about student opinions and behaviours after receiving the emails, to guide further interventions. These findings provide insight into how to use randomized A/B comparisons in everyday channels such as emails, to provide empirical evidence to test our beliefs about the effectiveness of alternative design choices.
翻译:教官和学生之间的电子邮件通信无处不在,探索如何测试如何使电子邮件信息更具影响力,这是很有价值的。本文探讨了使用电子邮件让学生提前规划和思考每周开始作业的设计空间。我们运用了一系列电子邮件提醒,使用随机的A/B比较来测试这些电子邮件设计中的替代因素,为更广泛的干预范围提供了实验范例和衡量标准的实例。我们还调查并采访了教员和学生,以比较他们对提醒的有效性的预测及其实际影响。我们介绍了我们的结果,这些结果似乎显然没有证实对有效电子邮件的预测,尽管有证据进一步探索这些干预措施,因为它们有时可以激励学生更经常地尝试做作业。我们还提供了关于收到电子邮件后学生意见和行为的质量证据,以指导进一步的干预。这些研究结果深入介绍了如何在日常渠道,例如电子邮件中使用随机化的A/B比较,以提供经验性证据,检验我们关于替代设计选择的有效性的信念。